A Progressive Pro-Israel Take on Mamdani’s NYC Victory
The race has been – as so much is these days – a political Rorschach test. What you see reflects the lens through which you look.
I cut my political teeth in New York City a few decades back, culminating when I helped run a mayoral campaign 25 years ago.
How long it’s been was driven home when I realized this week that Zohran Mamdani – winner of New York’s Democratic mayoral primary – was only nine years old on the day of our 2001 primary: September 11th.
The national spotlight was once again on New York City politics following Mamdani’s historic win Tuesday. The race carries important implications for Democratic party messaging and direction, and key lessons about successful campaigning in the 2020s.
For some, Mamdani’s win is an uplifting story of generational change, highlighting the potential of bold policies, energetic campaigning, new media and progressive economic populism. I know many who see the race as a road map for revitalizing the Democratic Party, with a focus on affordability and expanding the electorate.
For others, the win strikes a more ominous note, particularly Jewish Americans fearful of rising criticism of Israel and its connection to the growth of antisemitism.
The Palestinian cause has been central to Mamdani’s political activism over the last decade as it has for many progressives. He founded a chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine in college and brought a focus on the conflict to his service in the State Assembly.
New York City’s Mayor doesn’t make foreign policy. So there’s an argument that Israel-Palestine should really be irrelevant to the race, but Mamdani’s deep personal engagement on the issue justifies making his views part of the conversation regarding his candidacy.
One can legitimately – as I do – disagree with things he believes in and stands for. I oppose the Global BDS Movement, which he supports. I believe Israel should not only provide equal rights to all who live in the country, I think it should be accepted as the “national home of the Jewish people” (and I believe there must be a state of Palestine to be the same for the Palestinian people). He rejects identifying Israel in this way.
But legitimate policy disagreement cannot justify the abuse unleashed on Mamdani. If you want to plumb the depths of the cesspool of tweets, statements, memes and more online, be my guest. I won’t help drive traffic to them by giving you links.
It won’t take you long to be shocked by the extent of the hate and deep-seated anti-Muslim bigotry and racism. Of course, the bile comes not just from the online fringe; I can still find it in me to be shocked that a Member of Congress would call on the Attorney General to strip Mamdani of his American citizenship and deport him.
Jewish communal leaders have been quick to condemn Mamdani for his positions on Israel and his refusal to condemn phrases like “Globalize the Intifada.”
I myself find that phrase repugnant – having lived in Jerusalem during the bombing campaign of the 90’s when my favorite cafés and my bus line were terror targets and I was steps away from an exploding market stall.
I and many Jews hear support for ‘intifada’ not as opposition to occupation but as support, even encouragement, for violence. I understand that Palestinians and their advocates argue it refers to an uprising – without violence – but I hope they understand that’s not how most in the Jewish community and other allies hear it.
Political violence must be condemned unequivocally – as October 7th must be. My belief that what’s happening in Gaza today has crossed every moral red line doesn’t mean that I’m willing to accept when others who oppose the Israeli government’s actions fail to speak out against terror and violence by Hamas and other groups.
Progressive Jewish leaders like my friend NYC Comptroller Brad Lander and other leaders on the left of the Jewish political spectrum have important work to do to help Mamdani hear our pain and understand the fear certain words can hold for the Jewish community, even those who align with his politics.
Other Jewish communal leaders – including those who don’t share Mamdani’s politics – need to step forward as well. Their voices are needed to say that the wave of race-baiting Islamophobic hate unleashed against him has been vile, despicable and unacceptable.
If the Jewish community wants to assemble a broad coalition to fight rising antisemitism, we have to have other communities’ backs when they face unacceptable and dangerous hatred.
It’s stating the obvious that nuance is sorely lacking on all things Israel-Palestine.
On the one hand, positions taken by Mamdani and other pro-Palestinian activists lack understanding of and sensitivity to Jewish history, the demographics of global Jewry and our deep connection to the land of Israel.
On the other, the insistence by some on defining antisemitism so broadly that it encompasses protected political speech – including fierce opposition to Israel and its policies – can, in my opinion, actually harm the fight against antisemitism.
This race highlighted a lot of the long-standing tensions running deeply through the Jewish community, the Democratic Party and society more broadly post-October 7 - divides which opportunists on the authoritarian MAGA right are all too eager to exploit.
We’ll need some tough conversations in the months ahead - both within the pro-democracy coalition and the Jewish community - about how to address difficult issues. If Jews and non-Jews of democratic principle are going to beat the threat we all face from the authoritarian right, we can’t allow self-defeating arguments over Israel to tear us apart. We have to engage those with whom we may in good faith disagree and hold tough conversations with compassion, curiosity and empathy.
And, finally, we need to chart a path that joins a commitment to Jewish safety and Israel’s security together with clear, meaningful and unapologetic support for Palestinian freedom and self- determination.
I have a strong suspicion that political figures like Zohran Mamdani may well have an important role to play if we’re going to succeed. I know that I – and many in our movement – are ready to give it a try.
Your words here are why I support J Street. Thank you for so clearly explaining what it means to be a Jew -- at least to me. I support the protection of both Jews in Israel and Palestinians in Gaza. One belief is not in opposition to the other. I support not killing people anywhere!!
First: Absolutely people should NOT be attacking Zohran Mamdani on the basis of his religion. And should denounce "Islamophobic comments" made about him.
At the same time; there should obviously not be an attempt to stifle debate about his - or anyone else -views with a blanket charges of Islamophobia - which is something that has not infrequently been done in politics- not least by the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). But I'm not going to get into whether I think his general agenda is good or bad for New York City. That's for others and the voters to determine. I "probably" wouldn't characterize myself as a "Progressive" but nor am I all the way on the other side on such issues. (Like probably the majority of people despite all the partisanship)
I also think it's perfectly fair for people to oppose him if they choose. They have as much right to be concerned - as people do to support him
But I do think you're probably underplaying the impact of his potential (or perhaps likely) Mayoral electoral victory, based on his Israel/Palestinians views (and what his supporters may do and say if he is elected.) This is New York City after all. Lot of Jews. A place where Mayor of New York do have an international impact. And its sort or dissimulation for some to profess there's no "foreign policy" issue in this election for for New York Mayor. (Just look at what some of his supporters are saying about his election.)
I think some of the responses to your piece just so far - which are obviously nothing to do with you - illustrate why "Friends of Israel" are concerned with the Democratic Primary Victory of Zohran Mamdani.
As I posted a few days ago
"Think absolutely people should NOT be opposing (or supporting) Zohran Mamdani for Mayor of New York based on his religion. Totally legitimate to criticize his ideology or political views or affiliations, past statements and non statements, or impact on New York, views re Israel, concerns about antisemitism, views of some of his supporters, etc. All these things should of course be up for discussion. But NOT his religion (or even his foreign birth). But certainly not his religion. (The one caveat: Unless he were a member of some “Muslim Brotherhood or that he was going around saying his Islamic beliefs impell him to take some action; something like that. But otherwise no) As a Jew one can’t - or at least, shouldn’t feel comfortable - on the basis of someone being attacked because of his religion. All the other reasons listed above are of course, fair game." https://substack.com/@michaellewisonline/note/c-129846948?